Format Legality

Dream of A Pie

New 24 Jul 2024 Asked by the-pokemon-prof 11 Comments

since people are sharing Maro dreams, I figured I'd share the dream I had a few weeks back (recorded in a place of honour in my drema journal) where I baked you a delicious apple pie, gave it to you at a convention, and when you bit into it you were horrified to find it full of foil copies of doubling season. you banned me from playing magic forever and i was thrown in the secret WOTC dungeons for my crime.


My dream self didn’t like Doubling Season pie?

Regulation of Monarch and Initiative

New 22 Jul 2024 Asked by flakmaniak 0 Comments

This is hatemail not just about how Monarch and Initiative should never be allowed in two-player, which they shouldn't. (No comment on them in greater-than-2P games; I'm sure they're wonderful there. I have no objection to them existing SO LONG AS they are ruled to just not work in two-player.) This hatemail is SPECIFICALLY about Palace Jailer. Why does it say "until an opponent becomes the Monarch"?! It should not ever be allowed in two-player! Thank you for listening to my hatemail.


Should there exist cards legal in Commander, but not Legacy? Such a designation doesn’t currently exist.

Approach to Color-breaking Cards

New 21 Jul 2024 Asked by alwaysatoad 4 Comments

Hey Mark! I'm wondering, why do you allow yourself to reprint color-breaking cards? It gives players, especially newer players, the wrong idea about the color pie. Instead of reprinting Chaos Warp, why not either (A) print a different, non-breaking card that achieves whatever it is Chaos Warp achieves for red, or (B) change the color pie so Chaos Warp isn't a break?


The problem is players want access to the cards. The compromise was to not add them to formats that they aren’t legal in. That’s why color pie breaks won’t get reprinted in premier sets (not counting bonus sheets that don’t change card legality).

Dealing with Overpowered Cards

New 03 Jul 2024 Asked by kallixti 27 Comments

Suppose a card in Foundations is too strong and ends up being banned in Standard. Do you really plan to keep printing it for up to 5 years? Or do you have some capability to swap out the banned card for future printings within the 5 years?


The plan is to not change the product. You’re pitching hypotheticals. We’ll see how we adapt if it happens.

Game Evolution Disappointment

New 02 Jul 2024 Asked by evillisa-hell 8 Comments

Hey Mark, I just wanted to say you've always seemed like a really cool guy. I've played magic for over 4/5ths of my life, since the early 2000s when I was only five years old, I even met most of my long time friends through it. But I think I finally feel alienated enough by it to drop it entirely.I always enjoyed every aspect of this game, from the deckbuilding, to the flavor, to the color pie and the possibilities it presented. I loved the fantasy of it, of planeswalkers and wizards, dragons and castles.Universes Beyond really was the end of it, all the way back then. When i heard the announcements I was terrified, I knew where it would lead even then. I loved the world of Magic, and it feels silly to say about a card game but I truly felt immersed in the world when I played, even with the different planes, everything cohered to an internal set of rules that seemed unbreakable.For a while I continued, our local scene created a variant format that banned Universes Beyond cards so I was able to ignore them, but then came Neon Dynasty. It felt strange to me, like it was breaking what I had come to expect out of the game. Most people disagreed, said it was still Magic enough, but I wondered just how far it would be pushed before Magic lost any identity of its own, anything that separated it from Fortnite or any other crossover soup known entirely for the things it borrows rather than the things it is.When I saw the first spoilers for Duskmourn, I think that was the straw that broke the camel's back. When I play at the table with my friends, I enjoy the fact that all the cards feel like part of one larger universe. And when I see cards with televisions and smartphones in them, with modern clothing and internet references, I just can't fit them together in my mind. It seems like a cool world, much like a lot of the crossovers are cool worlds, but I play Magic for well... Magic. If I wanted to play Fallout or Warhammer 40k, or watch Insidious or Walking Dead, then I would. But when I play Magic, I want to see magic.And it's canon, just as canon as Innistrad or Alara. We can't excise it like we can Universes Beyond, and if we can't, then what's even the point of trying to "protect the tone" with those bans? What tone are we protecting, that's already been shattered from within?More and more it feels like the game just isn't for me, doesn't want the kind of player that feels strongly about cohesion and immersion. And that's fine, it doesn't have to cater to me, and the current approach seems to bring in more people than it drives away. But it still just makes me sad, on a deep personal level, to give up on what has been such a major part of my life.In all likelihood, I'm an outlier, and you could easily say that Magic getting even broader in what it covers is only a positive thing. Take my critiques only as the lamentations of a single person. But when you can put anything in a piece of media, when there's no unifying idea of what is and isn't possible, then it just starts to feel meaningless.I'm sorry, I know you'll probably never read this, I mostly just needed to get it off my chest- and you're the closest thing to a human face Magic the Gathering has. Thank you for all the work you've put into it over the years, and I'm sorry that I can't enjoy it anymore.


Thanks for writing. From a big picture, Magic excels at creating variety and does poorly at consistency. The core idea of a trading card game is we make lots and lots of pieces you can play with and then you, the player, customize your game as you see fit. History has shown us, the wider we spread the potential of what Magic can be, the more people find something they enjoy and are attracted to the game. Think of it this way. Each player has a different sense of what Magic is to them. There’s no cutoff point where we make the majority of players happy. In fact, for many players, it’s the ever-expanding quality to the game that they enjoy most.This does mean though that we might make choices that don’t connect with what you personally enjoy, and I respect that. If Magic isn’t providing what you want out of it, that’s okay. My only recommendation is don’t get rid of your cards. Many Magic players rotate in and out of the game, and the number one complaint I hear from players who rotate back in is them having gotten rid of everything when they rotated out. Magic might not be what you need right now, but maybe a few years from now you’ve changed in ways which makes it something you will enjoy. Or maybe Magic will evolve in a way that speaks to you. The only constant I know is you and Magic will both change. Just leave yourself the possibility of reconnecting. Thanks for playing all these years, and I hope to see you again.

Names and Game Relevance

New 26 Jun 2024 Asked by aalgot 5 Comments

A set with modern in the name should not include anything not legal in modern. So realy in order to avoid the problem with modern horizons 3 commander recons you would have to name it “horizons 3” getting rid of the modern from the name.


I disagree with your premise. If premier decks can have Commander decks with cards not legal in Standard, Modern Horizons can have Commander decks not legal in Modern.

Legality of Un Set Cards

New 25 Jun 2024 Asked by admiralsmash-blog 4 Comments

Based on lessons from the last Un set, do you think the next Un set is likely to repeat the "some cards are legal in tournament play" thing, or will they all be acorn/silver border?


The data makes the question complicated. It both frustrated some players and made others buy more packs.

Pauper Commander Deck Query

New 24 Jun 2024 Asked by optimizedjank 11 Comments

Hi Mark hope you're doing well, I'm in dire need of an UN set ruling. There are only 8 common attractions and I want to play with an attraction deck in Pauper Commander (of which they are still legal in) but there is not enough to make a full deck. What do I do? Just run 8 or double up on some, or play without one entirely? Many thanks - Xan


Casually, just run eight. Note that this is technically breaking the rules, and other players might object.

Power Level Adjustment in Sets

New 19 Jun 2024 Asked by justforaskingmaro 5 Comments

Set B "obsoletes" set A is a strong word, but let's focus a moment on pioneer, not very old vintage cards. I have a database of "top playables" in pioneer, restarted after every banning. Cards get into list based on certain number of appearances in goldfish's tournament winners, but criteria is equal to all cards. 9 OG Theros cards are on the list, 5 KTK cards. 4 RTR cards (+ shocks) 21 MKM cards are. 20 LCI cards. 13 OTJ. New sets have vastly more cards in list, thus are stronger.


The switch for a Standard-focus to an Eternal-focus forced us to up the overall power level of premier sets in Throne of Eldraine, so yes, Throne of Eldraine and sets after do have an overall high power level. That wasn’t set by set creep though, but a conscious one-time adjustment.

Silver Border Problem Explanation

New 19 Jun 2024 Asked by irlnautica 3 Comments

Can you explain how the "silver border problem" differs from format legality? Like, if you can use a Rare card in Pauper because it was at one point printed as a Common, why can't you use a silver border card that's also been printed in black border?


It just creates confusion. Silver border has loudly been not for tournaments for so long, that it would cause arguments.

Commander Cards in Play Boosters

New 13 Jun 2024 Asked by izzipurrito 8 Comments

Amid the endless positivity I have towards MH3, I do have oThe presence of Commander cards in play boosters. Its a bit soul crushing when I buy a pack that is more expensive than a regular standard pack, and it has a card in it I can't even use in my Modern deck. I've not hidden the fact I dislike that Modern Horizons has Commander precons attached to them. But its also really frustrating when the Modern Horizons packs themselves have cards in them that you can't even use.


It’s a fine note. How do others feel? Do you only want cards in the pack that are legal in Modern, or would you like access to all the new designs in the product suite inside the booster?

Reasons for Mirrodin Card Ban

New 11 Jun 2024 Asked by godkingjinping 14 Comments

Was arcbound ravanger and those other cards during mirrodin standard banned For power level reasons or because it wasn't fun?


Both.

Modern Horizons 3 Legality

New 05 Jun 2024 Asked by izzipurrito 5 Comments

"Reprints become legal the day the set comes out."Follow up question: Does this mean the new cards in Modern Horizons 3 will be legal from the pre-release, however the reprints won't be legal until the official release the next week?


I went and did some research. I was incorrect. All cards from a set, which includes reprints, become legal in the formats they enter the day of the prerelease.

Modern Legal Date for Reprints

New 05 Jun 2024 Asked by izzipurrito 2 Comments

Hi Mark, I have a weird question about card legality.
For context, as of All Will Be One, new cards become legal "as soon as you have them" so that you can play with them as soon as you get them from the pre-release.But with MH3, that set reprints cards that already exist. So, on what day are the reprinted cards legal in Modern? If I were to somehow get my hands on MH3 product before pre-release, I would be able to take that to a tournament and it would be legal. Would that also mean I could take a Sapphire Medallion from Commander Masters to a tournament ahead of the pre-release?


Reprints become legal the day the set comes out.

Single-Color Deck Tournament Choice

New 03 Jun 2024 Asked by 00no-name00 48 Comments

The future of mankind is at stake! You’ve been selected as our champion in the Galactic Magic Tournament, and the Bergggs are your final opponent. They say if they lose they will recognize our right to exist, but if you lose, they’ll invade and Berggg-form earth. Rules of the tournament dictate that all Magic cards printed are legal, but you can only play one color and lands that produce mana of that color on your deck. The sideboard is all cards of that color ever made. Decks are minimum 60 cards and maximum 4 of each card except basic lands (no limit). No banned or restricted list exist. Which colori would you chose?


These rules seem to imply that you can play colorless cards. If that is true, blue is the correct choice. If you can’t play colorless cards, you might think about black.

Legal Counter Movement

New 31 May 2024 Asked by deathworld12 17 Comments

nesting grounds is the tournament legal version of giant fan for anyone asking why isnt giant fan legal in tournamet formats.


Nesting ground just moves counters, which the rules can do. It’s the changing of the counters, and the caring about what counters a card uses that gets us to acorn/silver-border territory.

Direct Printing for Commander

New 30 May 2024 Asked by 00no-name00 51 Comments

It seems wild to me that WotC cannot print cards directly to commander, without using the “this is legal in this other format, but banned from competitive play, but and if you want to play it in a casual format that includes 99 cards and an apart legendary creature you could wink wink”. It is the most played format of the game! It would seem good for business (and the format) that you could work something out and be able to support it by creating cars exclusively for it. No? I assume there’s a factor I’m not aware that is stopping this to be a thing or complicating matters . If you have any insight about this, I’d appreciate.Thanks!


Commander wasn’t created by Wizards, so we’re trying to be respectful of the group that has overseen it from the early days.

Reprinting Color Pie Breaks

New 29 May 2024 Asked by j-waffles 31 Comments

Are bonus sheet cards allowed to be pie breaks, since they don’t affect format legality? I get why desert twister wasn’t in thunder junction or the big score, but was very surprised it didn’t appear in breaking news or the commander decks


There are other rules about color pie breaks beyond the “we don’t add them to formats that don’t have them” rule. Another one is “we try not to reprint them if there isn’t a lot of player demand for the reprint”. Yes, some are staples in their format, so there’s a demand, but we try to reprint color pie breaks that we don’t have to.

Legality Versus Deck Restrictions

New 28 May 2024 Asked by aalgot 60 Comments

We don’t put legality in rules text. Except you do. That’s what “your deck can contain any number of cards named…” is


That’s not legality. If a card is not legal in the format, that line doesn’t make it so. Note that rule is format agnostic. It applies to all formats.

Commander Legality Clarification

New 28 May 2024 Asked by dungeonmasterryan 29 Comments

"We don’t put legality in rules text" mark the " can be your commander" text is on multiple commanders


That’s not legality. That line doesn’t make the card legal in a format it wasn’t previously legal in.


Portions of Marodigest are unofficial Fan Content permitted under the Wizards of the Coast Fan Content Policy. The literal and graphical information presented on this site about Magic: The Gathering, including card images and mana symbols, is copyright Wizards of the Coast, LLC. Marodigest is not produced by or endorsed by Wizards of the Coast. All other content © 2024 Webscape Internet Engineers. All rights reserved.