Army

Ubiquitous Tokens Expectation

New 21 Jul 2024 Asked by gcu-sovereign 4 Comments

Is the Ubiquitous Token of a plane something we should expect from visit to visit? Like, how Capenna has its gw citizens, Innistrad has black decayed zombies, LTR had orc armies [applicable to some silmarillion-based visit, I guess]I was looking at the Fish tokens in Bloomburrow and Mercenaries in otj and wondering if those were also more Worldbuilding statements or not.


It’s a mechanical tool that adds flavor, and something we definitely use when shaping a set.

Lack of Evasive Creatures

New 11 Jul 2024 Asked by natew000 6 Comments

In the Fallen Empires DTW (which I loved by the way), you mention that Fallen Empires had almost no flying or other evasion. Do you think that might have been the result of building the set “too top down,” meaning they had great ideas about the factions and simply forgot to include evasive creatures because the factions they came up with were all land and sea armies? This feels like a good lesson that could be useful to anyone designing a set without a design skeleton.


The East Coast Playtesters just weren’t super fond of flying. Most their sets had a smaller percentage of fliers than average (at the time).

Hypothetical Card Possibility

New 16 Jun 2024 Asked by baron-von-lucas 5 Comments

While I understand neither is something you'd currently make and we're squarely in hypothetical territory here, which do you believe would be more likely to be made? A Non-token Sapoling, or Non-token Army?


The former.

Nontoken Army Creature

New 16 Jun 2024 Asked by dumbasshivemind 8 Comments

if or when, nontoken army creature?btw I love all these new modern horizons commons! The designs are very cool and they make my melvin brain happy. Please give everyone involved in the design of Warped Tusker 3.75/3.5 high fives


If. We’re planning to keep it tied to Amass right now. High fives shall be applied.

Amass Army with Clone Text

New 14 Jun 2024 Asked by fanfactorpodcast 2 Comments

Do the rules support an amass army token that's has clone text?


A card could graft the ability onto an Army creature token.

Non-token Subtypes on Cards

New 14 Jun 2024 Asked by thunderweb 4 Comments

If/when: nontoken card with usually-token subtypes (such as Army, Blood, or Role)


We’ve made artifact cards that are Clue and Food, so Blood could happen. Army wants to stay only on tokens made by Amass as it causes balance issues if we start making Army cards. (I realize Changeling exists.) Roles probably want to stay on tokens as it conveys token-ness.

Success of Warhammer 40k Decks

New 10 Jun 2024 Asked by walker-of-the-yellow-path 19 Comments

Did the Warhammer 40k Universes Beyond decks do well? What's the chance of magic doing another one? Those sets got me way more interested in 40k, and now I'm painting a Drukhari (Dark Elf) Army, so it would be really cool to see some of the other factions the first four decks missed be represented in magic.


The Commander decks did well, so there’s always a chance.

Army Creature Type

New 02 Jun 2024 Asked by zozocracked 27 Comments

If or when: the Army creature type on a non-token?


If. Making Army creature cards would restrict what future Amass cards could do. Having the token restricted to the Amass mechanic is an important balance tool.

Community Projects Idea

New 15 May 2024 Asked by banksyguythrowingthings 11 Comments

MARO! Has it ever occurred to you that people will do projects like "Make a list of all the un-cards that work within the regular rules" and you could just like... ask for a reddit post which you could then review and post, saving you time? Same with an FAQ update I imagine? Maybe there's legal weirdnesses with that, but you likely have a small army of volunteers at your service if only you would ask for things.


A fine point.

Amassing White Humans

New 12 May 2024 Asked by merlynthe 28 Comments

If you were to do amass in another color (let’s say you were making a white human army), would you do “Amass white humans N”, have “Amass humans N” be inherently white, or do “Gather humans N” (or some word other than amass that signifies that it’s white)? The last two seem potentially confusing and the first one seems wordy. Is there a better solution that I’m missing?


My gut is we’d do Amass white Humans, if we were going to create new colors.

Army as Creature Type

New 01 May 2024 Asked by carvedocean 24 Comments

If/When, Army as a type on a Creature spell?


If. I think we like the Army token being an Amass thing.

Creature Type Amass

New 09 Apr 2024 Asked by spadesslick 32 Comments

If/When: at least one card that lets you amass an army with a creature type of the player’s choice.


If. It needs a set that wants amass creatively and where that choice is relevant, but I could imagine such a thing.

Possible Plant Amass

New 09 Apr 2024 Asked by prole-my-tariat 36 Comments

If/when amass plant army? 👀


If.

Token Creature Type

New 07 Apr 2024 Asked by crazydreamingninja 82 Comments

I saw the question about amassing without an extra creature type, and you said that it needed an extra type for the token art. If we saw an army like the boros legion (comprising of multiple creature types) would you make the armies second type something like soldier? Thus allowing the token art to feature, for example, a goblin, giant, angel and human all on one token?


The question was about having no type, not no second type.

Amass Without Type

New 07 Apr 2024 Asked by lykrast 34 Comments

If given the right set, would you do "Amass N" that makes an army with no extra creature type, or would it be too confusing/not worth it (and thus still be given a creature type)?


I think that would be confusing in a way with little upside. Flavorfully, the army has to be something. We have to show a picture of it on the token card.

UB Deck Cohesion Issue

New 09 Mar 2024 Asked by evscfa1 60 Comments

Most of my issue with UB, particularly the commander decks, is their lack of availability on MtGO, as well as their lack of cohesion at some points. Individually, the cards are absolutely flavor wins, but as part of a precon they really don't work cohesively. Take the Timey Wimey precon for example. That deck was absolutely pulling itself in different directions by trying to be time counters and investigate, and then several cards that had nothing to do with either strategy. I would have been more satisfied had the deck been all in on the time counters, rather than trying to split the deck's strategy.Another example is the Ruinous Powers 40K precon. It had a very heavy demon theme, but it was split between demons-matter/aggro and cascade/spellslinger. Flavorfully each card is an absolute banger. But the decks as a whole really lack a real focus on one or the other. An example of UB doing well is the LotR set as a whole. It allowed for flavor wins while still keeping themes appropriate for its strategy, with blue/black/red being heavy on amassing orc armies and buffing orcs, while green/blue was focused on scrying and payoffs for scrying. Flavor wins, while still keeping a clear focus for deckbuilding.


You’re comparing apples and oranges. A preconstructed deck has different limitations than a randomized product.

Villain Set Theme

New 01 Feb 2024 Asked by 3-slugcat-pilots-7-ornithopters 51 Comments

I still don’t quite get what a villain set is- is it like hour of devastation and all will be one focusing on the armies of the bad people, or is it something else?


Think of villains as a theme we’re building around. There are lots of tropes, archetypes, and themes to work with. Also, we’re using the existence of the omenpaths to allow us to collect famous villains from across the multiverse. Note that the Western theme also exists for us to work with.

Using Armies

New 29 Jan 2024 Asked by holychurchofgeronimostilton 23 Comments

If/when: Nontoken Armies printed in the same set as Amass?


If. I’m not sure we want to use Army outside of tokens.

Creature Types for Amass

New 15 Sep 2023 Asked by cerezawrites 37 Comments

Are there certain creature types the team has generally considered unviable for future Amass? For instance, I could see "Amass Rats" or "Amass Goblins" but imagine "Amass Wizards" would be a harder sell. Side question: Is "Army" like "Saproling" in which it likely won't be a printed card type and be reserved for tokens, and are there more types like that?


I guess the issue is does it flavorfully make sense of an Army? I can imagine a scenario where an Army of Wizards could make sense, but I agree it’s a narrow strip.

Amass Color Variants

New 12 Sep 2023 Asked by watdattho 29 Comments

Re: Amass. In the future could color get the same treatment as creature types did in LTR to let you make armies that are different colors as well as different creature types? E.g. Amass red Goblins. Amass blue Merfolk.


That’s not how we currently do Amass, but who knows?


Portions of Marodigest are unofficial Fan Content permitted under the Wizards of the Coast Fan Content Policy. The literal and graphical information presented on this site about Magic: The Gathering, including card images and mana symbols, is copyright Wizards of the Coast, LLC. Marodigest is not produced by or endorsed by Wizards of the Coast. All other content © 2024 Webscape Internet Engineers. All rights reserved.