Restoration Angel is one of, if not my favorite Magic card, so can you give high fives to the people involved in making Salvation Swan.

Can do.

Hey Mark, is Clocknapper from Unfinity going to recieve errata with Bloomburrow's release?

Yes. Scan down to the post I just made from some tweets by Matt Tabak.

which do you think is more likely: a more nautical-focused set taking place on ixalan, or on an entirely new world?

Another world, but Ixalan is known for its Pirates.

Just adding my voice to the din, I hate the new template change from post combat main to second main on every card, which is very functional errata on cards like Neheb the Eternal. It nerfs a lot of things in extra combat decks. Entirely too many things are once per turn these days, there's no need to change to older cards to that too.

There are a lot of things to juggle when changing terminology. The impact on a single card often isn’t as important as other gains made.

Mark, can you confirm if most animals in bloomburrow are vegetarian?I know the planeswalker's guide says that "Typically, animalfolk are vegetarians, enjoying a robust diet of seeds, nuts, grains, fruits, vegetables, and other nutrient-dense ingredients. ", but apparently some people have argued that means that each animalfolk is "mostly vegetarian" but eats meat and that is really driving me crazy.
- Sincerely, a rat player that also likes the pet bugs that the rats have in bloomburrow

Most are vegetarian. I believe some eat fish.

I noticed that "tap this creature, It gains indestructible until end of turn." Seems to be used occasionally as psuedo regeneration. Since regenerate target creature exists mainly as reminder text anyway, has there been any thoughts about just functionally errataing regeneration into the new tap+indestructible combo that we see lately?

It’s a bit more functional errata than we tend to do.

Hello, Mark, quick request: I'd like you errata the Outlaw batch to include Wizards effective immediately, and I'd also like you premptively errata all Lizard Warlocks in Bloomburrow into Lizard Wizards.This might have some unforseen play balance concerns and it would be tremendously confusing to have so many new cards not do what they say, but look at the upside: "Lizard Wizard" rhymes.Please and thank you.

If only creature types rhyming was a higher priority for R&D. : )

Maro, Bloomburrow looks amazing, but I have one problem. I am a kitchen table player and I love creature type decks. Some decks (like my knights) regularly get new cards, but others (like my kithkin) might see a new card once a decade. For Bloomburrow, I know that rats, squirrels, and birds are likely to show up I. The future and have a ton of past cards to use, but for the types like rabbits or raccoons, I imagine they will not be supported long term. Why should I make a deck for those types?

Bloomburrow existing will make us create them more than we would of had it not existed. If volume of creature types is a core issue to you (and I get why it would be), yeah, I’d stick to the creature types that have more history with the game. But there are a lot of players who will have a lot of fun using Rabbits or Raccoons even if they have to stretch a bit (and probably play changelings).

Could cards that have outdated counters or mechanics (ie cards that give -0/-1 counters, Contagion's weird -2/-1 counters) either get erattas for more appropriate counters or functional reprints with regular -1/-1 counters?

That’s the type of functional errata we don’t tend to do.

We've seen very few cards as of yet, but are the following mechanics exclusive to their faction: Valiant (Mice), Thresold (Rats), Expend (Racoons), Forage (Squirrels)? Or can we expect to see at least a little of (some of) them in more colors?

Those four mechanics are unique to one animal archetype.