How do you feel about "[condition] Annihilator?" Like, "Artifact Annihilator," "1/1 creature Annihilator," or "Token Annihilator?"

Not great. If it matters, it plays like normal Annihilator (aka unfun), and if it doesn’t, it’s just wordy text with minimal game play impact.

FYI you actually did your worst 10 mechanics once before in Drive to Work #693 and this was your list at the time:10. Haunt - Guildpact9. Radiance - Ravnica8. Ripple - Coldsnap7. Processors - Battle for Zendikar6. Annihilator - Rise of the Eldrazi5. Epic - Saviors of Kamigawa4. Rebel Mercenary - Mercadian Masques3. Gotcha - Unhinged2. Rhystic - Prophecy1. Bands with Others - Legends

FYI

If Annihilator was made deciduous; what color(s) would you put it in? I think either Red and/or Black or White and/or Black. But several in my playgroup think White & Red or Green & Red.

We wouldn’t, but given the hypothetical, black and red are most likely.

I know this is hard to do but can we get a card with Annihilator 5? We have at least 1 card with with numbers of 1-6 without the a 5.

Annihilator 5 is a very unfun ability for the opponent.

What are the chances of some of these test cards getting tweaked and actually becoming cards? As someone who loves slivers to death, and even coincidentally created a custom sliver-eldrazi card 7 years ago that gave annihilator to slivers (because I just really wanted that to be a thing), seeing Slivdrazi Monstrosity almost gave me a heart attack. I want it to be real with every single fiber of my being!

Part of doing the playtest cards was to elicit reactions from the players. What playtest cards do you all most want to one day become a real Magic card?

Is Annihilator was symmetrical and both playera had to sack permanents, would it be more balenced? Since this would help prevent the full snowball effect that it currently does, while making it both powerful and still flavorful or not something considered?

Continually losing permanents is not the recipe for fun.

Hi I was looking at the storm scale and saw that annihilator was said to be at a 9. What specifically made annihilator unlikely to be reprinted?

It is unfun and unpopular. (Those two things are related.)

You've said that Annihilator 1 and Annihilator 6 both count as an instance of the same keyword for Modular Monstrosity, but what about Forestwalk and Islandwalk? Do they count as separate keywords, or are they both instances of Landwalk? For that matter, what about Denimwalk? Is it also a form of Landwalk?

Here’s how it works. If the keyword name stays the same but just the number changes (Annihilator, Rampage, etc.), you can only name it once a day. If the name of the ability switches words (landwalk, protection, etc.) you can name each version once per day. In other words, if you say Annihilator 4, you can’t then name Annihilator 2 on the same day, but if you name islandwalk, you can later name mountainwalk on the same day.

Apologies if you've already answered this, but can you give numerical keywords to modular monstrosity? (Mainly asking for giving annihilator X)

Not only can you, you must and it must have been something printed on a card.

Can modular monstrocity only name one-word keywords (lifelink, prowess, undying), or also ones with modifiers, like annihilator 6, swampwalk, protection from everything, cumulative upkeep - add R, outlast W, etc.?

No, it can name any keyword regardless of word length. It just has to have been printed in a creature card.