"Gift a tapped Fish" creates a tapped 1/1 blue Fish creature token.If a card says "Gift a Human" or "Gift a Vehicle", would those tokens have different power, toughness, and color?

They could. It would be defined (most likely in reminder text).

For what it’s worth, I actually think the biggest issue with Duskmourn isn’t the “modern” stuff, so much as Magic’s trend towards so many cards representing a genre trope, often literally by name. That said, it’s really exacerbated by the modern setting, which is unusual territory and thus feels like it’s there only to really ensure those tropes and references are as blunt as possible, rather than being a part of a cohesive world.A third factor that really makes this not gel for me is that modern horror relies on a threat that is anomalous and unique to be scary. Innistrad made a world full of Frankensteins and Draculas into a believable ecosystem, and I just don’t know that I can get there with a world full of Jasons, Freddys, Samaras, etc.All of this is to say, I would be a bit disappointed if this setting does poorly and the takeaway is just “no more tennis shoes.” I know there’s an audience for the tropey cards, but it feels like they’ve become so numerous and so blunt that it’s overshadowed the world building and left me far less curious and excited about new planes than I used to be. Generally, a magic plane with more modern technology and culture intrigues me, but when it’s just a vehicle for references I lose interest.

Please read the Planeswalkers Guide to Duskmorn:

Planeswalker’s Guide to DuskmournIt is very much a carefully thought out and crafted world.

If I destroy your vehicle why does the creature that crewed it get to live? You sound have to flip a coin to see if your creature survived the car crash

It’s better gameplay. Also, most drivers walk away from crashes.

Hello. I'd like to see more vehicles flavored as giant, human-shaped robots. Can I get a non-binding confirmation that it's technically possible that some maybe, might show up in 'Volleyball'?In a related aside, I'd love to see a Gundam universe beyond set.

Vehicles, meaning the artifact subtype, doesn’t currently get creature types when it animates.

Could vehicles have prototype?

My gut is no, but that’s just a guess.

So you've said before that Neon Dynasty started, correct me if im wrong, without Ninjitsu or Samurai and more of a focus on Auras and Sagas vs Vehicles and Equipment, with Ninja and Samurai being the commander decks. How far along did those come? I've heard people say Isshin and Satoru were the precon face commanders and were put into the set instead? Is that true? :)

Ninjutsu wasn’t in the vision design handoff with plans of it being a focus of a Ninja Commander deck, but that’s the only thing you stated that I actually said.

If/when: A artifact type similar to equipment specifically designed for vehicles (and/or artifact creatures to expand design space if needed) that doesn’t fall off while your vehicles aren’t creatures?

If. It’s pretty niche. Enchant (Creature or) Vehicle basically has that functionality, though not an artifact.

Could crewing vehicles / mounting mounts ever give abilities to the crew / rider?

Because they have to be tapped, it’s hard to give them abilities for the turn that are relevant. I could imagine giving them something that’s more relevant longterm like counters.

Hey Mark! I'm curious why Set Design went for the vehicle variation for mount rather than the reconfigure variant suggested by vision design, to me the latter seems to capture the 'creature that combines with a rider' idea really well. Although maybe this goes back to the unicycle equipment/vehicle debate

It was significantly less complex/wordy and more intuitive.

Will saddle be deciduous like how vehicles are?

It has that potential.