Lightning Bolt

Regeneration and Removal Spells

New 18 Jul 2024 Asked by duckily 4 Comments

re: "more regeneration hosers than regeneration effects" early removal spells were printed with "no regeneration" clauses because the primary use case of regeneration was to survive damage, such as from combat or a lightning bolt, rather than to survive a destroy spell


I don’t believe that was the intent, but it is how it played out.

Appreciating the Otters in Magic

New 16 Jul 2024 Asked by magicalotterlady 11 Comments

Please pass my thanks to whomever decided otters should be a thing in Magic.I've carried an otter plushie around with me to events through my entire Magic playing career, so almost 15 years. Ive had an otter along for the ride from pretty much every FNM to PTQs to traveling everywhere I could drive within 8 hours to play Legacy for several years or even trips to the other side of the US for large events a couple of times.I was screeching and immediately tried building an otter deck when Lutri and Theving Otter came out with Ikoria. I was literally babbling with joy at the otters in Wilds of Eldraine for MONTHS. To say I'm beside myself with excitement for Bloomburrow would almost be an understatement.My favorite thing to build or play in Magic are tribal-based decks. I built an angel one as my second ever deck (Shards of Alara/Zendikar standard) so I could teach my mom to play before she passed. I was known for a knight/Sword of _____ and _____ deck for years. I've even played Merfolk and Tribal Lightning Bolt (burn) decks a time or two. But I can now have my beloved otters as a theme for my deck.Literally the only way that it could be more perfect for me would have been if there was an Otter Knight named Rora for my little tournament companion.So thank you for making my love for Magic even stronger by adding otters.


I like making otter people happy. : )

Lightning Bolt in Standard Legal

New 29 Jun 2024 Asked by narragrapho 7 Comments

If or when: Lightning Bolt standard legal again?


If. It really warps the environment is the problem.

Defining 'Warps the Format'

New 09 Jun 2024 Asked by banksyguythrowingthings 34 Comments

For folks unclear on what "warps the format" means, consider that in Modern and Legacy, any creature with cost 3 or more and power 3 or less is basically unplayable (Unless it has a strong ETB or similar upsides). There are just too many people playing lightning bolt and your creature is extremely likely to be cheaply removed by the game's best (and perhaps best-balanced-for-its-early-power-level?) common card.


Correct. Lightning Bolt prevents a lot of creatures from seeing tournament play.

Lightning Bolt's Chance in Standard

New 07 Jun 2024 Asked by megaquestionsformark 27 Comments

With the caveat that you're not a power level guy, what's your gut feel on Lightning Bolt having another chance in Standard now the format has more sets and more power generally?


I’m skeptical. It really warps the environment.

Powercreep Perspective

New 23 May 2024 Asked by pantswithoutlegholes 22 Comments

RE: powercreep. i find it odd that people think cards are getting too strong when many of the best cards are still those from the original set. not even just the moxen and black lotus, cards like lightning bolt have simply never been outclassed and still see play in the most powerful formats.


I asked R&D what was the most powerful card I ever designed. As a group, they agreed Tinker. That came out in Urza’s Saga back in 1998, which means I designed it in 1996 or 1997. I’ve been designing Magic cards for twenty-nine years, and my most powerful one was designed just under thirty years ago. : )

Identical Names Issue

New 11 May 2024 Asked by thunderweb 0 Comments

Can the rule handle cards with same name and different oracle text? (e.g. a new artifact card named "Lightning Bolt", or a new sorcery card named "Swamp")


No. It’s why we did it in an Un-set.

Subtype Absence

New 02 May 2024 Asked by thunderweb 27 Comments

Is there a term for these type of cards? "(Type) cards that don't have any (type) subtype"- creature cards without any creature subtype (such as "Go-Shintai of X", Legendary Enchantment Creatures - Shrine)- artifact cards without any artifact subtypes (such as "Greatest Show in the Multiverse", an Artifact Enchantment - Saga)- other type of cards without respective subtypes (such as "The Wanderer" for Planeswalker, "Evolving Wilds" for Land, "Lightning Bolt" for Instant, etc.)


There is not a term for it, as it’s not something we need to talk about in design.

Power Creep Misconceptions

New 30 Mar 2024 Asked by sobek16 32 Comments

You stated that, “power creep isn’t about us making individually powerful cards”. Isn’t this only true to a certain extent: if you created a one mana lightning bolt that did four damage wouldn’t that be power creep?


That’s more about making a broken card. Power creep talks about a larger shift of environment.

Lightning Bolt Standard

New 25 Mar 2024 Asked by misenaive-blog 47 Comments

In the last 10 years or so you guys have been slowly improving on the concept of "Shock + Conditional Upside" or "Bolt + Minor Restriction" in Standard sets, and while I think this experiment has been doing well, do you think we could reach a point where reprinting original Lightning Bolt in Standard again could be a possibility?


It’s not off the table, but it’s a hard constraint to build Standard around.

New Permanent Dynamics

New 24 Mar 2024 Asked by thewongside-blog 17 Comments

When creating a new permanent type (such as the Battles in MOM), how much do cards like Lightning Bolt (i.e. deal damage to any target) factor into them? Just a thing I noticed as Planeswalkers and Battles (the highest profile new permanent types as I recall) have backwards compatibility with that specific wording.


It depends if damaging them is relevant.

Lightning Bolt Reprint

New 07 Jan 2024 Asked by dharthgators 46 Comments

If or when, Bolt getting reprinted in a Standard/Pioneer legal set?


If. Lightning Bolt really warps environments.

Naming Mechanic Clarification

New 06 Jan 2024 Asked by rockon101000 32 Comments

If I control Katerina of Myra's Marvels and have named H, and cast the Haduken version of lightning bolt, do I make the cat? Thank you!


Yes. That version of the card is called Haduken. Note, you don’t get a cat if you named L.

Inspiration from Past Cards

New 27 Aug 2023 Asked by hitek1208 20 Comments

When designing a card for a new set, how often would you say you look back on a past card and play around with modifying different aspects (mv, p/t, types, etc) to fill a similar role? (Like lightning bolt led to a lot of reds' cheap damage)


We look back and adapt old cards all the time.

Lightning Bolt's Impact

New 15 Jul 2023 Asked by narragrapho 44 Comments

Is Lightning Bolt too powerful to be released in a standard set in near future?


I’m not a play designer, but I know it greatly warps any environment it’s in.

Lightning Bolt Standard Return

New 03 Jun 2023 Asked by butttaco7 76 Comments

When or if: Lightning Bolt returns to standard?


If. It really warps the environment.

Edible Cards' Effects

New 02 Apr 2023 Asked by rawfishfan420 78 Comments

Impressed that the new edible masters set actually paralyzed half of my mouth when eating a lightning bolt. Were you concerned with the health of mono red players when designing the set or did you figure that they would weigh the risks/wouldn't care when it came to mouth burns and numbing?


If red cards don’t burn you’re mouth when you eat them, what are we doing?

Lightning Bolt Reprint?

New 17 Jan 2023 Asked by rottinghellkite 41 Comments

If or WhenA lightning bolt reprint into a standard set?


If. It really warps the environment in a way that makes other Standard-legal sets harder to make.

Myra Gameplay Mechanics

New 17 Nov 2022 Asked by chibinyanta 32 Comments

First off, loving Unfinity, but just wanted to check something to make sure I'm playing Myra correctly.

  1. If I've got 3 attractions and roll a 6, I can put all of their abilities on the stack in whatever order I want?
  2. If I have an attraction with a spell imprinted on it, does the visit/spell resolve first, or is it dealer's choice?
  3. If I have an attraction with Lightning Bolt and an attraction with Twincast, will I be able to cast Lightning Bolt and then Twincast targeting Lightning Bolt?
  4. I guess to kinda of recap and summarize if I've got X attractions with Y imprinted cards and roll a 6, is there any specific order I need to stack things like spell, visit ability, spell, visit, etc, or can I just stack everything however I want?
Apologies if this has been asked or I'm missing something obvious, I haven't been able to find anything and thinking of the possibilities has kind of been melting my brain :P


  1. Whatever order you like.
  2. You can order the spell effect (from Myra) and the visit effects in whatever order you like.
  3. No, you can’t.
  4. Stack things however you like between Attraction visits and Myra spell triggers.

Implementing Rare-B-Gone

New 27 Sep 2022 Asked by admiralsmash-blog 33 Comments

Re: Rare-B-Gone, couldn't it work in black border the same way Apocalypse Chime and all the other expansion matters cards do, by caring about the original rarity a card was printed at? That way reprints don't impact its effect.


That requires too much knowledge. For example, without access to a database, do you know the rarity of first printing of cards? Does counter target common spell stop a Disenchant? Or a Counterspell? Or a Lightning Bolt?


Portions of Marodigest are unofficial Fan Content permitted under the Wizards of the Coast Fan Content Policy. The literal and graphical information presented on this site about Magic: The Gathering, including card images and mana symbols, is copyright Wizards of the Coast, LLC. Marodigest is not produced by or endorsed by Wizards of the Coast. All other content © 2024 Webscape Internet Engineers. All rights reserved.