Intuition is a blue card, and I feel like it’s a safe guess to say that intuition would be in pie for black. But what about green? Green is allowed to do some self mill stuff, so it feels like it would be a bend? Or would it have to only get creatures to be fair game for green?

The way we’re interacting with impulse effects (look at top N cards of a library, take <blah> and then put the rest in the bottom of the library in random order) colorpiewise is treating them like we would tutoring effects. Green can tutor for lands and/or creatures, so it can impulse for them. This is mostly due to us trying to lessen shuffling effects.

I think it's weird that Intuition was allowed to remain as it is (you can search 3 of the same card), given that it was a template mistake compared to what design wanted. Is there another case where a card was used in a non-intuitive way before it came out?

I did point out the template violated my design intent, but the rest of R&D liked it. That’s why it stayed.

Hello Mark, when you guys make a card that is broken in EDH is it planned? (Example: Containment Construct pairs w/Artificer’s Intuition and Lion’s Eye Diamond)

I think “broken” is a high bar, especially in an eternal format. We have lots of designers that think about Commander, but there are a *lot* of potential card interactions, so sometimes.

I shall tap 44 mana to play "Birthday Trivia" on my turn. 'Target Maro must search thru his deck and reveal information pertaining to my favorite card, Gifts Ungiven. If he cannot, he is forced to give up trivia on the Storm mechanic itself.' :)

When I designed Intuition (in Tempest), the intent was you had to pick all different cards, but I didn’t write it clear enough and people were picking the same card. I pointed out that wasn’t what I intended, but they were enjoying the card as it was so they wouldn’t change it. Gifts Given was me redoing Intuition that way I intended it to play. Happy Birthday!