Scapeshift

Mythic Rarity Reasoning

New 18 Jun 2018 Asked by suigenyukiouji 44 Comments

What's the reasoning behind reprinting Crucible and Scapeshift at Mythic instead of Rare? From what I've seen of how rarity is determined over my 9+ years of playing the game, it's mostly impact on draft/sealed (which these both have next to 0) and slightly mechanical complexity (which these both are not complex).


There are other factors. For instance, we have to balance giving players access to old cards while respecting the feelings of the players who currently have the cards.

Card Fit Analysis

New 01 May 2016 Asked by abundantfrog 42 Comments

I want to say that thoughtseize is different from a card like snapcaster mage or liliana of the veil, because thoughtseize can fit in most any deck in its colors and be a great fit. Snapcaster mage needs a significant amount of low-cost instants/sorceries that are relevant at all points in the game. Or more deck-specific cards like scapeshift at rare without the utility lands to make the combo, or ad nauseum, or cards along that line.


If Snapcaster Mage was in Shadows over Innistrad it would warp Standard. It warps formats with a lot more cards available to play.

Card Potential Defense

New 15 Feb 2013 Asked by rebmcr 15 Comments

To the naysayers of Search the City, I would respond with this: A lot of the same rhetoric was said of Scapeshift, but the smart players weren't surprised to see it spawn a Pro Tour-worthy deck. Search the City has a lot of potential for interaction with future cards — I wouldn't write it off just yet.


Seconded.


Portions of Marodigest are unofficial Fan Content permitted under the Wizards of the Coast Fan Content Policy. The literal and graphical information presented on this site about Magic: The Gathering, including card images and mana symbols, is copyright Wizards of the Coast, LLC. Marodigest is not produced by or endorsed by Wizards of the Coast. All other content © 2024 Webscape Internet Engineers. All rights reserved.