Generated on 10 Jul 2024
Based on 430 answers
The examination of Mark Rosewater's insights into the creature type Bird in Magic: The Gathering reveals a wellspring of information encompassing game design philosophies, historical developments, and anecdotal trivia that have shaped the prevalence and evolution of Birds in the game. This article explores the frequently asked questions, origins, design decisions, trivia, and potential future paths discussed by Mark Rosewater.
Beginnings and Origins
Birds have been a part of Magic: The Gathering since its inception, evolving through numerous sets to become a foundational creature type. Mark Rosewater explained that in early Magic, each bird type was treated as its own creature type. This changed when a desire to support Bird tribal mechanics led to consolidation. Today's birds are categorized under the broad 'Bird' type, enabling cohesive game mechanics that facilitate cards and strategies caring about Birds collectively.
The origins of Birds of Paradise are particularly noteworthy. The iconic card was designed top-down from its art rather than starting from its mechanics—a hallmark of good design practices in early Magic: “The art on Birds of Paradise was originally painted for Tropical Island but the bird was too prominent, so Richard [Garfield] designed a card for it and got new art for Tropical Island.”
Design Choices and Philosophy
A consistent theme in Rosewater's responses has been the relationship between design intuition and player perception. He stressed that designs must align with player expectations to avoid confusion, particularly illustrating that all modern Birds in Magic have flying: “When you fight human nature in game design, you are fighting a losing battle. If players expect birds to fly, just make your birds fly.”
This principle impacted creature designs such as the Moa, a flightless bird that confused many players due to their lack of familiarity with the species. Future designs avoid such pitfalls by ensuring that birds prominently known to be flightless, like ostriches and penguins, are exceptions addressed cautiously: “We might make an exception for penguins. Or maybe Magic’s penguins can fly. :)”
Diversity and Representation
There is ongoing dialogue surrounding the diversity of creature types and their representation. Rosewater mentioned that despite the consolidation of Birds into a single type, different classes and roles are often explored, as seen in Aven, which are always classified as Bird Soldiers in a deliberate push towards multi-creature types: “I decided to always use both Bird and Soldier as their creature types. This was me pushing for what ultimately ended up as Race Class.”
Further, he noted in response to player queries that Birds might one day see more tribal support, pointing out that Bird tribal mechanics existed but were underutilized: “I do think we could have more Bird typal cards. I’m sure the birds will have some tribal love again in the future. Magic has a lot of birds.”
Color Pie and Gameplay Mechanics
Discussions on the color pie and gameplay mechanics often cleave to balancing gameplay and thematic representation. Green, typically averse to flying, showcases this balance. While Birds of Paradise sits as a notable, albeit bend, exception to green’s mechanics, its reprints are “grandfathered” due to historical significance and legacy: “If Birds of Paradise wasn't grandfathered in due to early popularity, I doubt you'd see it in green today.”
Fun Trivia and Anecdotes
Rosewater’s insights also brought fun and interesting trivia that endears fans to the game’s rich history. For instance, his anecdote that Mark Poole’s art for Birds of Paradise was initially for Volcanic Island (later changed due to a prominent bird) adds layers to the card's mythos. He also expressed regret over Kangee, Aerie Keeper, reflecting on development nudges that weakened the card, emphasizing a desire to create a strong Bird lord and pledging to do better for Bird aficionados in the community.
Controversies and Changes
Interestingly, Rosewater also addressed the some controversies surrounding creature type changes. For example, Birds being occasionally mentioned in the same breath as Dinosaurs—prompting debates about scientific classifications versus public perception: “If the vast majority don’t recognize the classification, it’s not the people that are the problem.”
He also tackled critiques against the reduction of unique creature types in favor of broader classifications, highlighting efforts for consistency and streamlined gameplay experiences, as echoed in consolidations like the Viashino, cleverly balancing creative identity with mechanical utility.
Future Prospects
Looking forward, the questions often probe the potential future of Birds, a popular creature type that consistently garners attention and speculation. Rosewater hinted at possible future developments like creating more non-flying Birds if a suitable opportunity arises, specifically with culturally iconic birds that don't breach player expectations for flying mechanics.
In summary, Mark Rosewater’s detailed engagement with questions about Birds in Magic: The Gathering paints a broad picture of how design philosophy, historical developments, and player engagement have shaped—and will continue to shape—the portrayal and mechanics of Birds in the game.
The examination of Mark Rosewater's insights into the creature type Bird in Magic: The Gathering reveals a wellspring of information encompassing game design philosophies, historical developments, and anecdotal trivia that have shaped the prevalence and evolution of Birds in the game. This article explores the frequently asked questions, origins, design decisions, trivia, and potential future paths discussed by Mark Rosewater.
Beginnings and Origins
Birds have been a part of Magic: The Gathering since its inception, evolving through numerous sets to become a foundational creature type. Mark Rosewater explained that in early Magic, each bird type was treated as its own creature type. This changed when a desire to support Bird tribal mechanics led to consolidation. Today's birds are categorized under the broad 'Bird' type, enabling cohesive game mechanics that facilitate cards and strategies caring about Birds collectively.
The origins of Birds of Paradise are particularly noteworthy. The iconic card was designed top-down from its art rather than starting from its mechanics—a hallmark of good design practices in early Magic: “The art on Birds of Paradise was originally painted for Tropical Island but the bird was too prominent, so Richard [Garfield] designed a card for it and got new art for Tropical Island.”
Design Choices and Philosophy
A consistent theme in Rosewater's responses has been the relationship between design intuition and player perception. He stressed that designs must align with player expectations to avoid confusion, particularly illustrating that all modern Birds in Magic have flying: “When you fight human nature in game design, you are fighting a losing battle. If players expect birds to fly, just make your birds fly.”
This principle impacted creature designs such as the Moa, a flightless bird that confused many players due to their lack of familiarity with the species. Future designs avoid such pitfalls by ensuring that birds prominently known to be flightless, like ostriches and penguins, are exceptions addressed cautiously: “We might make an exception for penguins. Or maybe Magic’s penguins can fly. :)”
Diversity and Representation
There is ongoing dialogue surrounding the diversity of creature types and their representation. Rosewater mentioned that despite the consolidation of Birds into a single type, different classes and roles are often explored, as seen in Aven, which are always classified as Bird Soldiers in a deliberate push towards multi-creature types: “I decided to always use both Bird and Soldier as their creature types. This was me pushing for what ultimately ended up as Race Class.”
Further, he noted in response to player queries that Birds might one day see more tribal support, pointing out that Bird tribal mechanics existed but were underutilized: “I do think we could have more Bird typal cards. I’m sure the birds will have some tribal love again in the future. Magic has a lot of birds.”
Color Pie and Gameplay Mechanics
Discussions on the color pie and gameplay mechanics often cleave to balancing gameplay and thematic representation. Green, typically averse to flying, showcases this balance. While Birds of Paradise sits as a notable, albeit bend, exception to green’s mechanics, its reprints are “grandfathered” due to historical significance and legacy: “If Birds of Paradise wasn't grandfathered in due to early popularity, I doubt you'd see it in green today.”
Fun Trivia and Anecdotes
Rosewater’s insights also brought fun and interesting trivia that endears fans to the game’s rich history. For instance, his anecdote that Mark Poole’s art for Birds of Paradise was initially for Volcanic Island (later changed due to a prominent bird) adds layers to the card's mythos. He also expressed regret over Kangee, Aerie Keeper, reflecting on development nudges that weakened the card, emphasizing a desire to create a strong Bird lord and pledging to do better for Bird aficionados in the community.
Controversies and Changes
Interestingly, Rosewater also addressed the some controversies surrounding creature type changes. For example, Birds being occasionally mentioned in the same breath as Dinosaurs—prompting debates about scientific classifications versus public perception: “If the vast majority don’t recognize the classification, it’s not the people that are the problem.”
He also tackled critiques against the reduction of unique creature types in favor of broader classifications, highlighting efforts for consistency and streamlined gameplay experiences, as echoed in consolidations like the Viashino, cleverly balancing creative identity with mechanical utility.
Future Prospects
Looking forward, the questions often probe the potential future of Birds, a popular creature type that consistently garners attention and speculation. Rosewater hinted at possible future developments like creating more non-flying Birds if a suitable opportunity arises, specifically with culturally iconic birds that don't breach player expectations for flying mechanics.
In summary, Mark Rosewater’s detailed engagement with questions about Birds in Magic: The Gathering paints a broad picture of how design philosophy, historical developments, and player engagement have shaped—and will continue to shape—the portrayal and mechanics of Birds in the game.